KyphoLift

Why now

Imaging Staff Are Not a Footnote.

Two injury measures. No slack in MRI. A patient-handling playbook that already moved the number. Thinking the way we always have is not how you prepare.

KyphoLift® Solutions From the Point of Care.

Shaped by patient and clinician needs.

Magnets advanced. Zone IV positioning mostly didn’t. The patients, the workforce, and the schedule all changed. Safe, efficient, practical solutions start at the point of care.

Two different measurements

Two injury measures. Two different questions.

One is how often imaging professionals report an occupational injury. One is how often radiology technologists appear in hospital patient-handling injury rates. Same pressure on the suite — not the same yardstick.

62.6%

Occupational injury — imaging professionals

Medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals who reported an occupational injury (Macavei & Clark, Radiol Technol 2020).

For an MSK-specific read, about 51% (62.6% × 81.7% muscular). The 62.6% figure is all occupational injury — not an “MSK injury rate.”

26.2

per 1,000 FTE

Patient-handling injuries — radiology technologists

2nd-highest patient-handling injury rate among hospital occupations (NA 40.2 · RT 26.2 · RN 18.2). CDC/NIOSH OHSN, 116 hospitals, 2012–2016. OSHA-recordable handling only.

Radiology technologists specifically (not all “MRI techs”). From OHSN participating hospitals — not a national census. A different measure from the 62.6% survey.

AHRA 2025

MRI has no slack.

  • 87.8%

    Fixed outpatient MRI slot length (usually 30 or 45 minutes).

  • 75%

    Scheduled 5 or more days out.

  • 28.7%

    Wait more than 15 days.

AHRA 2025 Diagnostic Imaging Operations & Access Survey, Scheduling section, Table i.

Why it’s urgent now

  • 40.3%

    Adult obesity (NHANES 2021–23).

  • 20–40%

    Hyperkyphosis in adults 60+ (Katzman, JOSPT 2010).

  • 17.4%

    MRI vacancy (ASRT 2025; up from 6.2% in 2020).

Section 504 is access-to-examination context for HHS-funded facilities. It is separate from ADA Title III, and it is not a requirement to purchase any specific device — including KyphoLift.

The category already moved

Safe patient handling is not a new idea.

  • 54%

    Drop in VA patient-handling events, 337 → 154 per 10,000 FTE, FY2006 → FY2014 (VHA Occupational Health Chart Book 2015).

  • 29.6%

    VISN 8 pilot (P<0.05) — the same pilot as the 30% paper, not a second replication.

  • 56%

    Teeple 2017 pooled estimate across multi-setting SPHM studies. Literature-wide — not a VA-specific result.

Engineering controls are not new. The pressure to bring them into the bore is.

Solutions from the point of care, shaped by patient and clinician needs.

KyphoLift · South Jordan, Utah · 801-946-7400 · info@kypholift.com

Sources

  • Macavei & Clark, Radiol Technol 2020
  • CDC/NIOSH Occupational Health Safety Network (OHSN), 116 hospitals, 2012–2016
  • AHRA 2025 Diagnostic Imaging Operations & Access Survey, Scheduling, Table i
  • VHA Occupational Health Chart Book 2015 (FY2006–FY2014 per 10,000 FTE)
  • Teeple et al., 2017 (pooled, multi-setting)
  • NHANES 2021–23 adult obesity
  • ASRT 2025 vacancy survey
  • Katzman et al., JOSPT 2010
  • HHS Section 504 Final Rule — access context at HHS-funded sites, not a device mandate